Field of Glory II

The main pros of the game

• Historical Accuracy: Many users appreciate the game's realistic portrayal of ancient tactical combat, noting that it is a better representation than other games in the genre.
• Tactical Depth: The game emphasizes the importance of formations, troop quality, and positioning, making each decision impactful. Players find the strategic elements rewarding and satisfying.
• Variety of Armies: The game features a wide range of historical armies, allowing for diverse gameplay experiences and customization options.
• Multiplayer Experience: Users enjoy the multiplayer mode and the ability to engage in custom matches, with some praising the community and the competitive aspects.
• Replayability: The option to replay battles with newly generated maps and a decent AI challenge contributes to the game's longevity.
• Engaging Campaign Mode: The campaign mode follows historical battles and allows players to choose their approach, which adds depth to the gameplay.

The main cons of the game

• Complex Mechanics: Some players find the game mechanics overly complicated and not intuitive, leading to frustration, especially for newcomers.
• Lack of Fatigue System: A notable oversight is the absence of a fatigue system, which many players feel is critical in a melee-focused tactical game.
• Visual Presentation: The graphics are described as functional but not impressive, which may deter players looking for a more visually appealing experience.
• AI Issues: Several reviews mention that the AI can be predictable and sometimes overly reliant on numerical advantages rather than strategic behavior.
• Single-Player Limitations: Some users criticize the single-player experience, stating that the random battle generator lacks depth and that the campaign does not feel cohesive.

The features or elements that are missing from the game according to users

• Fatigue System: Many players express a desire for a fatigue mechanic that would affect troop performance during battles.
• More Historical Battles: Users feel that the game lacks sufficient historical battles compared to its predecessor, which diminishes the campaign's appeal.
• Improved AI Behavior: There are calls for smarter AI that can adapt to player strategies rather than relying on numerical advantages.
• Enhanced Zoom Functionality: Some players wish for better zoom features to keep track of units during melee engagements.
• Clearer Tutorials: A number of reviews indicate that the tutorials do not adequately explain the game mechanics, leading to confusion for new players.

Summary

• Overall, while Field of Glory II has been well-received for its tactical depth and historical authenticity, it faces criticism for its complexity, AI behavior, and certain missing features that could enhance the gameplay experience.

Summary generated on: November 20, 2025