King Arthur: Legion IX

The main pros of the game

• Engaging Combat Mechanics: Players appreciate the turn-based tactical combat, which remains a highlight of the game. The battles are described as satisfying and require strategic thinking.
• Unique Theme: The concept of leading undead Roman legionaries adds a unique twist to the gameplay, which some players found enjoyable.
• Character Abilities: Each of the six characters has distinct abilities, providing a level of customization and tactical variety during battles.
• Atmospheric Music and Lore: Many users praised the soundtrack and the blend of mythological and historical elements, contributing to the game's immersive experience.
• No Permanent Death: The removal of permanent deaths and injuries allows for more fluid gameplay, making it less punishing compared to its predecessor.

The main cons of the game

• Linear Gameplay: A significant number of players criticized the game for being too linear and scripted, lacking the exploration and freedom found in other RPGs.
• Recycled Content: Many reviews mentioned that the game reuses assets, maps, and enemies from the previous title, making it feel less innovative and more like a DLC than a standalone game.
• Limited Character Roster: With only six recruitable heroes, players felt the game lacked variety and depth in character options compared to the original.
• Weak Story and Voice Acting: The narrative was often described as weak and lacking coherence, with many players noting poor voice acting that detracted from the overall experience.
• Boring Endgame: The post-campaign content was criticized for being repetitive and unengaging, with many players feeling it did not offer enough variety or challenge.

The features or elements that are missing from the game according to users

• Inventory Access During Missions: Players expressed disappointment that they could not access their inventory during missions, limiting tactical options.
• Character Customization: Users missed the ability to choose and customize their character builds more extensively, as the game restricts players to a fixed roster.
• Dynamic Choices: Many felt that the decision-making aspects were simplified and did not significantly impact the story or gameplay, reducing replayability.
• More Diverse Environments and Missions: A desire for more varied maps and mission structures was noted, as players found the game’s environments repetitive.
• Depth in City Management: The city-building and management aspects were seen as underdeveloped compared to the previous game, leading to a less engaging experience.

Summary

• Overall, King Arthur: Legion IX seems to offer a solid tactical RPG experience but falls short in terms of innovation, story depth, and variety compared to its predecessor, leaving many players feeling it is more of a DLC than a full-fledged sequel.

Summary generated on: October 30, 2025