Field of Glory II: Medieval

The main pros of the game

• Unique Medieval Setting: The game offers a rare opportunity to engage in medieval warfare, featuring historical units like knights and the Varangian Guard.
• Visual Detail: Players appreciate the detailed unit designs and the beautiful medieval art in the user interface, which enhances the overall aesthetic experience.
• Tactical Depth: The game is praised for its complex combat system that emphasizes strategy, positioning, and unit morale, making battles feel rewarding when players master the mechanics.
• Replayability: The ability to create custom battles and campaigns, along with various factions, allows for diverse gameplay experiences.
• Multiplayer Options: The play-by-email (PBEM) system is highlighted as a unique aspect that allows for strategic depth in multiplayer matches.

The main cons of the game

• Lack of Cohesion and Command Structure: Players feel that the game lacks a proper chain of command and army organization, resulting in chaotic battles where units operate independently rather than as cohesive formations.
• Limited Unit Growth: There is no meaningful progression or experience system for units, which diminishes the historical feel and personal attachment players might develop for their troops.
• Poor Campaign Structure: Many reviews criticize the campaign mode as being a series of disconnected battles without a compelling narrative or strategic depth, leading to a frustrating experience.
• User Interface Issues: The interface is described as clunky and not intuitive, making it difficult for players to discern important information during battles.
• AI and Difficulty: Some users report that the AI can be unpredictable and that the difficulty settings do not provide a consistent challenge, leading to frustration.

The features or elements that are missing from the game according to users

• Historical Accuracy: Some players express disappointment with the lack of historical authenticity in unit performance and battle mechanics, feeling that the game does not fully capture the essence of medieval warfare.
• Leadership Mechanics: There is a call for more detailed leader mechanics, including unique skills and attributes that reflect historical commanders, which are currently absent.
• Logistics and Supply Systems: Users mention the absence of logistics, supply management, and other strategic elements that would add depth to the campaign and battles.
• Siege Mechanics: Many players desire the inclusion of siege assaults, which are a significant part of medieval warfare but are not represented in the game.
• Better Tutorials: The in-game tutorials are criticized for being inadequate, failing to teach players the necessary mechanics and strategies effectively.

Summary

• Overall, while Field of Glory II: Medieval has its strengths, particularly in its tactical gameplay and unique setting, players have expressed a desire for deeper mechanics, improved campaign structure, and better user experience to enhance the overall enjoyment of the game.

Summary generated on: November 20, 2025